How to attack each question type
Each type has a method. Teaching your child to run the right method automatically is worth more than any amount of general reading.
Main idea
The method: before looking at the options, your child should say the passage's point in one sentence, in their own words. Then find the option closest to that sentence.
Why it works: wrong options in main-idea questions are usually true statements that are too narrow (a single detail) or too broad (a general topic). Having your own sentence first makes both errors visible.
- Too narrow: a fact from one paragraph only
- Too broad: the general subject rather than the argument
- Off-passage: true in the world, absent from the text
Inference
The method: for every candidate answer, find the line that proves it. If your child cannot point at the evidence, it is not the answer — however sensible it sounds.
Why it works: inference questions are built around plausible distractors. The distractor is usually true in real life but unsupported by the passage. "Point at the proof" is the only reliable filter.
- An inference is one small step beyond the text — never three
- Watch for absolute words in options: always, never, all, none
- "Most likely" in the stem means best-supported, not certain
Author's purpose
The method: ask what the writer wants the reader to do or feel after reading. Then match to a verb: inform, persuade, entertain, describe, warn, compare.
Why it works: purpose questions are answered by text type more often than by content. A passage full of statistics and neutral language is informing; one full of rhetorical questions and emotive adjectives is persuading.
- Paragraph-level purpose questions ask why that paragraph exists — usually to give an example, a counter-argument, or a consequence
- Emotive language, second person and rhetorical questions signal persuasion
Vocabulary in context
The method: cover the word, read the sentence, and decide what word would fit the gap. Then pick the option closest to that guess.
Why it works: the test writer deliberately chooses words with several meanings and asks for the one operating here. Guessing from the sentence first stops your child choosing the most familiar meaning by reflex.
- Read the full sentence, and often the one before it
- Substitute each option back in and hear which one works
- Beware the "obvious" meaning — it is usually the trap
Supporting evidence
The method: read the claim in the stem, decide what kind of proof would establish it, then scan for that specific proof rather than reading everything again.
Why it works: evidence questions are locate-and-return tasks. They reward scanning, not re-reading, and they are where re-reading a whole passage does the most damage to the clock.
- Numbers, dates and quotations are common evidence anchors
- The right option restates the claim in different words — not the same words
- An option that merely repeats the claim is not evidence for it
Sentence correction and punctuation
The method: read each option aloud in your head. Grammar errors are usually audible before they are analysable, and punctuation errors show up when you pause where the marks are.
Why it works: these items test a small, closed set of rules that can be learned in weeks. Because most families skip them entirely, they are the cheapest marks in the section.
- Apostrophes: possession versus contraction, and never for plurals
- Commas in lists, after introductory phrases, and around extra information
- Subject–verb agreement across a long subject
- Direct speech punctuation and capital letters
- Its/it's, their/there/they're, your/you're, to/too