EduTest Numerical Reasoning 2026: Question Types & Samples
7 14 ?×3%
EduTest Numerical Reasoning · Scholarship & Selective Entry

EduTest Numerical Reasoning
patterns, data and fast decisions

This is the section that catches strong maths students out. It is an ability test, not a content test — the arithmetic is deliberately simple, and the difficulty lives in spotting the rule, reading the table and knowing when an estimate is enough. Here is every question type, with original samples you can try.

Free · 3 days' access · Timed, exam-style papers with worked solutions

0Minutes for the section
0Question types to know
0Roughly, per question
0Calculators permitted

The short version

EduTest Numerical Reasoning is a timed, multiple-choice, non-calculator section of roughly 30 minutes. It tests how well your child reasons with numbers — finding the rule behind a sequence, pulling a figure out of a table or chart, translating a worded scenario into a calculation, and judging when an estimate will do.

It is deliberately light on taught content. You will not be asked to factorise or to recall a circle formula. What you will be asked is to notice that 5, 10, 9, 18, 17 alternates between doubling and subtracting one — and to notice it in about twenty seconds.

That is why it trips up children who are strong at school maths. The arithmetic is easy; the seeing is the test. Familiarity with the recurring rule families is what turns it around, and that is what most of this page is about. For the taught-content section, see our EduTest Mathematics guide.

The confusion worth clearing up

Numerical Reasoning is not the second maths paper

Families routinely prepare for these two sections as if they were the same thing. They are not, and preparing for one does very little for the other.

Ability

Numerical Reasoning

Tests reasoning with numbers: sequences, patterns, relationships, data interpretation and estimation. Content is kept minimal on purpose so that a student who has covered more of the syllabus is not advantaged.

Improves through: exposure to rule families and question shapes. Slower to move than content, but very responsive to volume of practice.

Achievement

Mathematics

Tests taught curriculum content: fractions, percentages, area, volume, equations, statistics. If your child has not met a topic at school, they cannot reason their way to it.

Improves through: closing content gaps and building arithmetic speed. The fastest-moving section on the paper.

What this means in practice: a child who scores well in Mathematics and poorly in Numerical Reasoning is not bad at maths. They are unfamiliar with the pattern types. That is a fixable, specific problem — and it is fixed by working through many short sequences, not by revising topics.

What comes up

The eight Numerical Reasoning question types

EduTest does not publish a breakdown, so the shares below are indicative — our estimate from working through practice material at each entry level. The ordering is the reliable part: sequences and data interpretation dominate.

~20%

Number series

A run of numbers with one missing, usually at the end. Find the rule, apply it. Arithmetic steps, multiplying steps, alternating steps and second-difference patterns all appear.

~15%

Number patterns

The missing term sits in the middle, or the pattern runs across a grid or shape rather than a line. Same rule families, harder to see because the layout hides them.

~12%

Numerical relationships

Pairs that follow a hidden rule — 4 gives 13, 6 gives 19, so 9 gives what? Or analogies such as 8 : 24 :: 11 : ?. Name the operation, then apply it.

~14%

Tables

A small table of figures with several questions attached. Read the row and column labels before the numbers — most losses here are reading errors, not calculation errors.

~13%

Charts & graphs

Column graphs, line graphs and pie charts. Typical asks: largest change, total, average, or how much more one category is than another.

~10%

Data interpretation

Drawing a conclusion rather than reading a value — converting a percentage of a stated total, comparing two categories, or spotting which statement the data supports.

~10%

Word problems

Rates, unit pricing, time intervals, sharing and scaling, expressed in a sentence or two. The work is in the translation, not the arithmetic.

~6%

Estimation

Explicitly asking for the closest approximation. Rounding to friendly numbers is the intended method — exact calculation is the trap, because it burns the time the question was designed to save.

On the percentages: EduTest has never released a question-type breakdown, and the mix varies between forms and entry levels. These are our estimates from practice material and we label them as such rather than presenting them as official. Treat them as a guide to where revision time goes.

The core skill

The rule families behind almost every sequence

Sequences look infinite in variety. In practice a small number of rule families cover the overwhelming majority of what appears. A child who checks them in a fixed order stops guessing and starts recognising.

Check thisWhat it looks likeExampleNext term
1. Constant differenceSame amount added or subtracted each time3, 7, 11, 15, …19 (+4)
2. Constant ratioSame amount multiplied or divided each time2, 6, 18, 54, …162 (×3)
3. Growing differenceThe gaps themselves form a pattern2, 3, 5, 8, 12, …17 (gaps 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
4. Shrinking differenceGaps get smaller by a fixed amount100, 91, 83, 76, …70 (gaps 9, 8, 7, 6)
5. Alternating ruleTwo rules taking turns5, 10, 9, 18, 17, …34 (×2, then −1)
6. Squares & cubesRecognisable number families1, 4, 9, 16, …25 (squares)
7. Add the previous twoEach term is the sum of the two before it1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, …13
8. Two interleaved seriesOdd positions form one series, even positions another2, 100, 4, 90, 6, 80, …8 (then 70)

The order to check them in

1
Write the gaps underneath

Before anything else, work out the difference between each pair of terms. This single habit solves families 1, 3 and 4 outright and tells you instantly whether the sequence is growing steadily or accelerating.

Gaps first, always
2
If the gaps explode, try multiplying

Differences of 4, 12, 36 mean the terms are tripling, not adding. Divide each term by the one before it and see whether you get the same number twice.

Ratio check
3
If the gaps swing up and down, suspect alternation

A sequence that rises sharply then falls slightly is almost always two rules taking turns. Look at every second term instead of every term.

Every second term
4
Check the number families

Squares to 15, cubes to 5, and the doubling chain 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 should be recognised on sight. A surprising share of sequences are one of these lightly disguised.

Recognise, don't calculate
5
Still nothing? Test the options

It is multiple choice. Put each option in the blank and ask whether it makes the run consistent. This is often faster than finding the rule from scratch, and it always beats staring.

Work backwards

Rehearse this order until it is automatic. The children who do well here are not more numerate — they have a checklist and they run it. Ten short sequences a day for a month will do more for this section than any amount of general maths work.

Tables, charts & data

Reading data without losing marks to reading

Data questions are the most avoidable losses in the section. The arithmetic is usually trivial; the errors come from taking the wrong row, the wrong column, or the wrong units.

1

Read the labels first

Row headings, column headings, axis titles and units, before a single number. Ten seconds here prevents the most common error in the whole section: answering with the right calculation on the wrong data.

2

Underline what is asked

Total, difference, average, increase, how many more. These four or five command words decide the whole question and they are easy to skim past.

3

Check the scale

Charts often count in fives, tens or hundreds, and a bar reaching the third gridline may be 30, not 3. Read one labelled point before trusting any unlabelled one.

4

Answer only what is asked

If the question wants the difference, do not give the larger value. Distractors are built from the intermediate steps, so a half-finished question usually has an option waiting for it.

5

Use the total as a check

Where a total is given, your parts should sum to it. Where percentages are given, they should reach 100. Both are free error-detectors that cost two seconds.

6

Do not re-read the whole table

Several questions usually attach to one table. Read it properly once, then answer them as a block rather than starting fresh each time.

The habit that matters most: read the question, then go to the data — not the other way round. Children who study the table first absorb information they will not need and arrive at the question with less time and no advantage.

Estimation

When the fast answer is the correct answer

Some questions ask outright for the closest approximation. Many more do not ask, but reward it anyway — because a rough figure eliminates two or three options in seconds.

Round to friendly numbers first

397 × 21 becomes 400 × 20 = 8000. The true answer is 8337, and if the options are 800, 4000, 8000 and 80 000 then the estimate has already finished the question.

6120 ÷ 29 becomes 6000 ÷ 30 = 200. The true answer is about 211 — close enough to pick from options spaced a hundred apart.

48% of 812 becomes half of 800 = 400. Nothing more precise is needed unless two options sit close together.

Know when not to estimate

Estimation fails when two options are near each other — 407 and 413, say. That closeness is itself the signal: the question wants exact work, and it is telling you so through its options.

So the decision is made by looking at the options, not the question. Widely spaced options mean estimate; tightly spaced options mean calculate.

Reading the options before working is the single highest-value habit in this section.

The rounding rules worth automating

SituationRound toWhy it is safe
Multiplying two large numbersNearest ten or hundredErrors stay proportionally small, and the order of magnitude is what the options usually test
DividingMake the divisor friendly first29 becomes 30, 19 becomes 20; adjust the dividend to match so the division stays clean
PercentagesNearest 5% or 10%48% is a half, 33% is a third, 26% is a quarter — all instant
Adding a column of figuresNearest ten, then correctAdd the rounded values, then adjust by the leftovers; far fewer carrying errors
Reading a chartNearest gridlineBars are rarely meant to be read to the unit; the question is about comparison
Try them

EduTest Numerical Reasoning sample questions

Twenty-six questions across all the recurring types, in EduTest's four-option multiple-choice style. Click an option to see whether it is right and read the worked solution. Aim for about thirty seconds each.

These are original questions written by Selectivetrial. EduTest has never released its real papers, so nobody has genuine past questions — anything advertised as one is a reconstruction. Everything below was written by our team to match the level, style and timing of the real section. They are for practice, not a prediction of what will appear.

Score 0/0 answered

Number series

Find the rule, then apply it. Write the gaps underneath before you do anything else.

Question 1

What number comes next?

371115?
19. The gaps are 4, 4, 4 — a constant difference. Adding 4 to 15 gives 19. This is the first family to check, and it accounts for more sequences than any other.
Question 2

What number comes next?

261854?
162. The gaps (4, 12, 36) are exploding, which is the signal to try dividing instead: 6 ÷ 2 = 3, 18 ÷ 6 = 3, 54 ÷ 18 = 3. So the rule is ×3, and 54 × 3 = 162. The 108 option is a doubling error.
Question 3

What number comes next?

14916?
25. These are the square numbers: 1², 2², 3², 4², so the next is 5² = 25. You can also see it in the gaps — 3, 5, 7 — which grow by two each time, giving 16 + 9 = 25. Recognising the squares to 15 on sight saves this calculation entirely.
Question 4

What number comes next?

235812?
17. The gaps are 1, 2, 3, 4 — growing by one each time — so the next gap is 5 and 12 + 5 = 17. Whenever the gaps are not constant, the gaps between the gaps are the next thing to look at.
Question 5

What number comes next?

100918376?
70. The sequence falls by 9, then 8, then 7 — a shrinking difference — so the next drop is 6: 76 − 6 = 70. The 68 option assumes the gap stays at 8.

Number patterns

Same rule families, but the missing term is buried in the middle or the pattern alternates. Harder to see, not harder to solve.

Question 6

What number is missing?

714?2835
21. The run counts up in sevens. Because the blank is in the middle you can check from both sides — 14 + 7 = 21 and 28 − 7 = 21 — which confirms the answer without relying on one direction.
Question 7

What number comes next?

51091817?
34. Two rules alternate: double, then subtract one. 5 × 2 = 10, 10 − 1 = 9, 9 × 2 = 18, 18 − 1 = 17, so next is 17 × 2 = 34. A sequence that jumps up sharply then dips slightly is nearly always alternating.
Question 8

What number comes next?

112358?
13. Each term is the sum of the two before it: 5 + 8 = 13. This family is worth recognising on sight, because the gaps look irregular and can send you hunting for a rule that is not there.
Question 9

What number comes next?

2100490680?
8. There are two series interleaved. The odd positions run 2, 4, 6 and the even positions run 100, 90, 80. The next slot is an odd position, so it continues the first series: 8. When a sequence swings wildly between large and small values, read every second term.

Numerical relationships

A hidden rule links each pair. Name the operation, test it on a second pair, then apply it.

Question 10

If 4 gives 13 and 6 gives 19, what does 9 give?

28. Test the simplest rules first. Multiply by 3 and add 1: 4 × 3 + 1 = 13 ✓ and 6 × 3 + 1 = 19 ✓. So 9 × 3 + 1 = 28. Always verify on the second pair before applying — several rules fit one pair, few fit two.
Question 11

If 3 ★ 4 = 25 and 5 ★ 2 = 29, what is 6 ★ 3?

45. The rule is the sum of the squares: 3² + 4² = 9 + 16 = 25 ✓ and 5² + 2² = 25 + 4 = 29 ✓. So 6² + 3² = 36 + 9 = 45. When simple addition and multiplication do not fit, squares are the next thing to try.
Question 12

8 is to 24 as 11 is to which number?

33. The relationship is ×3, so 11 × 3 = 33. The 27 option comes from adding 16 — the difference in the first pair — which is the trap in every numerical analogy: check whether the link is additive or multiplicative before applying it.

Tables, charts and data interpretation

Read the labels before the numbers. Several questions usually hang off one display, so read it properly once.

Table — house points at a school sports carnival

HouseTrackFieldSwimming
Ashby453025
Byron384230
Corio502822
Darley324043

Points awarded in each of the three event groups.

Question 13

Which house scored the most points overall?

Darley. Totals are Ashby 100, Byron 110, Corio 100 and Darley 115. Corio leads on Track with 50, which is the distractor — a strong single column is not the same as a strong total.
Question 14

How many more points did Byron score in Field than Ashby did?

12. 42 − 30 = 12. The 42 option is Byron's raw Field score — the classic "answered the intermediate step" distractor that appears whenever a question asks for a difference.
Question 15

What was the total number of Field points awarded across all four houses?

140. 30 + 42 + 28 + 40. Pair the numbers for speed: 30 + 40 = 70 and 42 + 28 = 70, giving 140. Looking for pairs that make round numbers is faster and more reliable than adding straight down the column.

Chart — books read by a class each month

12Jan
18Feb
15Mar
24Apr
21May

Number of books read, January to May.

Question 16

Which month showed the largest increase on the month before it?

April. The changes are +6, −3, +9, −3. April's rise of 9 is the largest. February is the trap for anyone comparing heights rather than changes — the question asks about the step, not the value.
Question 17

How many books were read in total across the five months?

90. 12 + 18 + 15 + 24 + 21. Group for speed: 12 + 18 = 30, 15 + 24 = 39, plus 21 gives 90. Estimating first — five months averaging roughly 18 — would already point to 90.
Question 18

What was the mean number of books read per month?

18. The total is 90 and there are five months, so 90 ÷ 5 = 18. Where one question gives you a total, the next often reuses it — carry the figure forward instead of re-adding.

Data interpretation — how 400 students travel to school

MethodShare of students
Walk35%
Car30%
Bus25%
Cycle10%

Survey of all 400 students at one school.

Question 19

How many students travel to school by bus?

100. 25% is a quarter, and a quarter of 400 is 100. The 25 option is the percentage itself — always check whether the question wants a share or a headcount.
Question 20

How many more students walk than cycle?

100. Walking is 35% of 400 = 140 and cycling is 10% = 40, so the difference is 100. Faster still: the gap is 25 percentage points, and 25% of 400 is 100 — one step instead of three. The percentages sum to 100, which is a free check that you have read the table correctly.

Word problems

Ordinary arithmetic wrapped in a sentence. Find the "one" first — the unit rate — and most of these collapse.

Question 21

A shop sells pens at 3 for $5. How much would 12 pens cost?

$20. Twelve pens is four lots of three, so 4 × $5 = $20. Scaling by the group is faster than finding the price of one pen, which here is not a whole number of dollars.
Question 22

A train leaves at 9:45 am and arrives at 12:20 pm. How long is the journey?

2 hours 35 minutes. Step to a friendly time first: 9:45 to 12:45 is exactly 3 hours, and the train arrives 25 minutes earlier than that, so 3 h − 25 min = 2 h 35 min. Bridging to the next whole hour avoids the borrowing errors that make time questions costly.
Question 23

Cinema tickets cost $14 for adults and $9 for children. What is the total for 3 adults and 4 children?

$78. 3 × $14 = $42 and 4 × $9 = $36, and 42 + 36 = 78. A quick estimate — seven tickets at roughly $11 each is about $77 — confirms the answer and rules out $69 immediately.

Estimation

The options tell you how precise to be. Widely spaced options mean round and move.

Question 24

Which is the best estimate of 397 × 21?

8000. Round to 400 × 20 = 8000. The true value is 8337, and since the options are an order of magnitude apart no exact work is needed. Doing the full multiplication here costs forty seconds for no extra marks.
Question 25

Roughly what is 6120 ÷ 29?

200. Make the divisor friendly: 6000 ÷ 30 = 200. The true answer is about 211, which is far closer to 200 than to 300. Adjusting the number being divided so it matches the rounded divisor is what keeps the estimate clean.
Question 26

Which is closest to 48% of 812?

400. 48% is just under a half, and half of 800 is 400. The true value is about 390. Recognising that 48% is "nearly half", 33% is "about a third" and 26% is "about a quarter" turns most percentage estimates into a single step.

Twenty-six questions is a warm-up, not a rehearsal

The real section runs about thirty minutes with a clock going and four other sections around it. That pressure is the thing worth practising, and it only exists in a full timed paper.

In the section

Five decisions that turn reasoning into marks

Numerical Reasoning punishes persistence more than any other section. A sequence either resolves quickly or it does not, and the skill is knowing which within about twenty seconds.

1
Read the options first

They tell you how precise to be, whether the answer is a value or a difference, and often let you work backwards. In estimation questions the spacing of the options is the instruction.

Options before working
2
Run the rule checklist in order

Gaps, then ratio, then alternation, then number families, then work backwards from the options. A fixed order stops the random guessing that eats time when a pattern does not jump out.

Checklist, not intuition
3
Verify on a second pair

Many rules fit one pair of numbers; few fit two. Before applying a rule to the blank, confirm it works somewhere else in the sequence. This one check removes most wrong answers in relationship questions.

Test twice, apply once
4
Hold a twenty-second ceiling

Sequences are unusually all-or-nothing. If the rule has not appeared in twenty seconds it is unlikely to appear in sixty. Eliminate what you can, commit, flag it and move.

Flag and move
5
Never leave a blank

EduTest awards marks for correct answers and deducts nothing for wrong ones. Sweep the final minute and fill every empty box. On a four-option question even a blind guess is worth 25%.

Always → blank sweep

Two passes, always. Bank everything that resolves quickly, flag the rest, then come back. Question order is not guaranteed to run easy to hard, so a student working strictly in order can lose easy marks at the end of the section to one stubborn sequence in the middle. The full method across all five sections is in our EduTest exam strategies guide.

Avoidable losses

The traps that cost marks in this section

Almost every one of these is a reading or decision error rather than a reasoning failure — which means a habit fixes it, not more practice.

Assuming a constant gap

Checking the first difference, finding 4, and stopping. Always check at least three gaps before committing to a rule.

Missing an alternating rule

A sequence that rises then dips is two rules taking turns. Read every second term before deciding it is irregular.

Answering the intermediate step

Giving the larger value when the question asked for the difference. Distractors are built from exactly these half-finished answers.

Wrong row or column

Right calculation, wrong data. Put a finger on the row and the column heading before reading the cell.

Ignoring the chart scale

Assuming gridlines count in ones. Read one labelled value before trusting any unlabelled bar.

Percentage instead of headcount

Answering 25 when the question wanted 25% of 400. Check whether the answer should be a share or a number of people.

Calculating when estimating

Doing exact long multiplication when the options are an order of magnitude apart. The options were telling you not to.

Refusing to abandon

Ninety seconds on one sequence costs three easy questions elsewhere. Every question is worth the same.

The error log that fixes them

Sort every wrong answer into one of four buckets

  • Never saw the rule — add that rule family to a drill list
  • Saw it too late — the checklist is not automatic yet
  • Misread the data — fix the labels-first habit
  • Careless slip — add a ten-second check before committing

What does not work

  • Revising school maths topics and expecting this section to move
  • Doing long sets untimed, where the twenty-second decision never happens
  • Reading solutions without re-attempting the sequence cold
  • Practising only the rule families your child already spots

The diagnostic that tells you what to do next: if most errors are "never saw the rule", your child needs breadth — many short sequences across all eight families. If they are "saw it too late", they need speed under a timer. If they are data-reading errors, they need the labels-first habit, not more sequences at all. Treating all three the same is why some students plateau here.

Preparation

A twelve-week plan for Numerical Reasoning

This section rewards little and often far more than long sessions. Ten sequences a day beats a two-hour block at the weekend. It sits inside the wider schedule in our EduTest preparation guide.

PhaseWeeksFocusWeekly shape
Diagnose1–2One timed section, then sort every error into the four buckets to find out which problem you actually have.1 timed section · 1 review · 10 sequences daily
Build breadth3–6Work through all eight rule families deliberately, one or two per session, including the ones your child finds awkward.2 rule sessions · 1 data set · 10 sequences daily
Build speed7–9Same material against a timer. Twenty sequences in ten minutes, then full sections. Enforce the twenty-second ceiling out loud.2 timed sets · 1 full section · error log review
Rehearse10–11Full mock papers with all five sections, so switching between reasoning and content sections is practised rather than met on the day.1 full mock · 1 review · targeted re-drills
Taper12Error log only, no new material. Short daily sequences to keep the checklist warm, early nights, logistics confirmed.10 min daily · no new topics

The one non-negotiable: ten short sequences every day, from week one to the day before. Recognition is built by volume and frequency, not by session length — and recognition is the entire section.

Parent questions

EduTest Numerical Reasoning — FAQs

The questions families ask us most often about this section.

What is EduTest Numerical Reasoning?

It is one of the five EduTest sections: a timed, multiple-choice, non-calculator paper of about 30 minutes that tests reasoning with numbers rather than taught mathematics. Questions cover number series and patterns, numerical relationships, tables, charts, data interpretation, word problems and estimation. The arithmetic is deliberately simple; the difficulty is in spotting the rule or reading the data correctly.

How is it different from the Mathematics section?

Mathematics is an achievement test — it assesses curriculum content your child has been taught, such as fractions, area and equations. Numerical Reasoning is an ability test — it assesses pattern recognition and logic, using very little taught content so that students who have covered more of the syllabus are not advantaged. They are separate, separately timed sections, and preparing for one does little for the other.

My child is good at maths but struggles with this section. Why?

Because it is not testing maths. It is testing whether they notice that a sequence alternates between doubling and subtracting one. That is a recognition skill built by exposure to many short sequences, not by revising topics. It is one of the most fixable problems on the paper once you know that is what it is.

How long is the Numerical Reasoning section?

Around 30 minutes. The number of questions varies by entry level and test form, but it works out to roughly thirty seconds each — which is why the twenty-second decision to abandon a stubborn sequence matters so much.

Can my child use a calculator?

No. EduTest is a non-calculator test throughout. Students work mentally or on whatever scrap space is provided. This is why estimation and friendly-number rounding are genuine exam skills here rather than shortcuts.

Is there a penalty for a wrong answer?

No. Marks are awarded for correct answers and nothing is deducted for incorrect ones, so an unanswered question can only score zero while a guess always has a chance. Every box should be filled before time is called.

What number patterns should my child know?

Eight families cover most of what appears: constant difference, constant ratio, growing difference, shrinking difference, alternating rules, square and cube numbers, add-the-previous-two, and two interleaved series. Working through them in a fixed order — gaps first, then ratio, then alternation, then number families — converts guessing into recognition.

Are there official past papers for Numerical Reasoning?

No. EduTest has never released its real papers, so genuine past papers do not exist publicly and anything sold as one is a reconstruction. What works is well-matched practice written to the same level, style and timing. We explain the distinction in our EduTest past papers guide.

How do we practise data interpretation at home?

Use real displays — a sports ladder, a weather table, a train timetable, a supermarket receipt — and ask the four question types that actually appear: what is the total, what is the difference, what is the average, and which changed most. The reading habit transfers directly; the source of the table does not matter.

How much time should we spend on this section?

Little and often. Ten short sequences a day for three months will move a Numerical Reasoning score more than a weekly two-hour block, because recognition is built by frequency. Add one timed section a week from about week seven to build the speed.

When should we start preparing?

Six to twelve months before the test is the usual window, with a twelve-week intensive phase at the end. This section in particular benefits from an early start, since recognition accumulates slowly and cannot be crammed in the final fortnight.

Does one weak section ruin the whole result?

No. The five sections are timed and standardised separately, then considered together, so one weak section lowers the overall picture without ending the attempt. Telling your child this before the day matters, because students who believe otherwise often turn one bad section into two.

Recognition is built by volume, not by revision

Reading about the rule families changes nothing on its own. Ten short sequences a day, a timed section each week and an honest error log are what move this number — and you can start the first paper today at no cost.

All five sectionsLive timerWorked solutionsSection-by-section reporting